Tedxjamaica Roberttrivers

Posted by AJ's Blog on April 24, 2019

2019-04-24-TEDxJamaica-RobertTrivers.md

  • the see and self-deception in Kingston
  • Jamaica who would have imagined it this
  • very big you see what is the season
  • self-deception
  • this seat is lying to others and that
  • shouldn’t be nonverbal it can be verbal
  • at the leadership and self-deception is
  • lying to yourself you can deny something
  • that’s true about yourself project it
  • onto someone else and then attack it in
  • the other person will end with such an
  • example now there are two main ways in
  • which well the function of
  • self-deception is given in the subtitle
  • here I believe and I’ve amassed a lot of
  • evidence that support the notion that
  • the primary reason we fool ourselves is
  • the better the fool of it and there are
  • two cases in point if I’m lying to you
  • now about something you actually care
  • about and you’re posting up and better
  • yet you know me you can watch my eye
  • movement you can listen to the pitch of
  • my voice especially if it blows up then
  • watch for unusual pauses and so on but
  • if I have lied to myself if I’m
  • unconscious that I’m practicing
  • deceptions my words will be surrounded
  • with the sincerity that it’s associated
  • with honesty
  • you’ll lack those cues for spotting my
  • reception the second is that we’re in
  • the business of promoting ourselves as
  • being more been effective than we really
  • are we elta people more than we do were
  • more beneficial we’re better looking
  • we’re smarter and so on so in that case
  • we can fool people India into having a
  • higher image of ourselves than the fact
  • worn in often shows up in people putting
  • themselves in the upper half of a
  • category so eighty percent of high
  • school students in the u.s. say they’re
  • in the top app for leadership ability
  • it’s not possible
  • but for self-deception you cannot beat
  • academia in the United States fully 94%
  • of professors regard themselves as being
  • in the top half of their particular and
  • I plead guilty I can be tired down to a
  • bed in a backward of UWI hospital and I
  • still think I’m doing better than half
  • my colleagues and that’s not just a
  • comment on my college but but this is
  • just our mouth this is just the way we
  • flap our boat do we really 70 percent of
  • us will sing when the top half of good
  • looks do we really think so or we just
  • flap in our mouths the next experiment I
  • think you’ll enjoy because it
  • demonstrates very clearly that something
  • deeper is going on it’s not just
  • flapping their mouths and this is
  • whether we think we’re better looking
  • than we really are and these are the
  • authors eppley and Witcher woman scripts
  • over here and what they’ve done then is
  • with the help of a computer named more
  • fur with more and more percentage of a
  • good-looking face which is the average
  • of 15 good-looking women picked out of a
  • sample of 60 ok so here is here is the
  • witch Church who is 20% better-looking
  • here’s half and half 50% more they morph
  • you with someone who’s got craniofacial
  • syndrome which makes you ugly now they
  • do the same thing with eppley only he’s
  • not too good-looking to start with
  • so you have to kind of shift it but
  • anyway he’s getting better-looking here
  • and even up here in this direction now
  • here’s the game they play and they say
  • it with you so you’ve got to imagine
  • that it’s your face and they do it and
  • they’ve morphed it now you’re sitting in
  • front of a computer screen blingo
  • suddenly there are 12 photos in front of
  • you max for your age and sex and one of
  • them the human and all you’ve got to do
  • is as soon as you spot it hit that
  • button and then point to it that
  • controls for people making mistakes okay
  • but here’s the tech in a number of the
  • runs and they repeated of course the
  • picture of you is real you in a number
  • of the runs it’s 20% better looking you
  • and in the number of runs it’s 20% of
  • their you so which do you see first well
  • you see better looking you first it
  • takes five percent longer time for a two
  • spot the real you and five percent
  • longer still subscribe the ugly you okay
  • so in your mind’s eye you are twenty
  • percent better looking if they give you
  • all those fifties at one time that we
  • saw there and asked you which one you
  • like most
  • it’s 20 percent better looking and this
  • is an important feature of deceit and
  • self perception you don’t exactly you
  • look by thirty percent it’s implausible
  • you don’t exaggerate it looks by 10
  • percent we think you’re giving away some
  • of the benefit so it’s about it at
  • twenty percent now I don’t need a social
  • psychologist to tell me about this
  • effect because if I’m in a big city I
  • see it nearly every week I’ll be walking
  • down the street like this talking to a
  • young and attractive woman not up to
  • nothing you understand just a lot more
  • like
  • like me enough to allow me to stay
  • nearby right and while I’m walking along
  • I spot on the other side of her an old
  • man right here ugly face falling apart
  • and he’s not even really walking he’s
  • more like shambling you know and then of
  • course I realized that’s me
  • reflected in the store windows so
  • self-perceived means seen really as
  • ugliness all right no we use verbiage
  • also to alter reality one unto the other
  • so for example one simple trick is
  • simply whether you make the boys active
  • or passive okay so if I was doing well
  • then I say I did this I did that and
  • benefits rained down on all of you
  • but if I do poorly I take the passive
  • voice and I’m a victim of circumstance
  • and this was perhaps best captured by a
  • man who ran into a telephone pole in San
  • Francisco about 20 years ago and it’s
  • reported by the police his description
  • was as follows the ball was approaching
  • my park when I attempted to swerve out
  • of the way and it struck me all right
  • perfectly legitimate but it shifted the
  • responsibility to the telephone for now
  • we know about the importance of words in
  • Jamaica I direct Safari for example the
  • rest of movement began in the 30s and it
  • was a movement of self pride and self
  • assertion by the dispossessed by the
  • underpass and by those that were most
  • African appearance so none of this me
  • I’ll go shop I am on even we sounded too
  • weak because it reminded them of me so
  • it’s I and I so arrests amount in full
  • spirit might say something like this I
  • am on a night I’ve been smoked a table I
  • since I see you early all right
  • and you feel good when you talk like
  • that so my son is on the internet
  • looking for Russian sites and he comes
  • across the rusted minefields slowly
  • going around the bend getting angrier
  • and angrier and angry
  • what is he mad about the wholesale
  • expropriation of Jamaican culture by the
  • larger culture with no acknowledgement
  • no thanks certainly no penny on the
  • dollar
  • terms like this next experience hi
  • I fooled ya
  • iPad ITV John is IP we got okay there
  • are other uses that are amusing
  • there is something from the euphemism
  • treadmill and which we invented
  • euphemism for something but then it
  • comes to to note the old thing so we
  • have to have a new euphemism
  • so toilet is too much like what what a
  • toilet is so now it becomes a bathroom
  • so you’re bathing in there but that’s a
  • little bit too personal so it becomes a
  • restroom can you taking a nap in there I
  • called the operator at Rutgers
  • University to get someone’s number and
  • some young man answered the phone and
  • said information assistance I thought
  • I’ve got the wrong number at first he’s
  • gotten a verbal range they okay now let
  • me give you another example from social
  • psychology where we’ve gotten past near
  • words there are two ways you can write e
  • on your forehead and what they do is
  • they make the person five times and
  • write because they don’t want to
  • thinking about it they wanted time to
  • sitting on the side and then just write
  • e so you can write a other focus E where
  • I write it like this so you can read it
  • or you can write a self focused E I
  • write it like so and I can see through
  • it in that’s an e now most people in
  • fact write another focus E but what is
  • interesting is it depends upon the
  • degree of power they feel and there are
  • these little tricks where you can induce
  • a feeling of power which is a temporary
  • but long enough to produce these effects
  • or you can’t reduce the feeling of low
  • power so someone with low power about
  • 12% of the time they do an other focus
  • social to see all the rest is others
  • hoping but if you’re high power you’re
  • three times as likely to be self talking
  • there’s a series of other car lifts that
  • this inducement of a feeling of power
  • you recognize facial expressions less
  • well you remember faces less well you
  • have a harder time taking the viewpoint
  • of someone else in a simulated situation
  • so power itself is inducing a kind of
  • ignorance and blindness of those
  • underneath you those underneath I’ve got
  • to pay attention to those variable now
  • it’s worse if it’s a man because we know
  • that men in various domains are more
  • overtime to them than women are over
  • contrast there’s a tendency for all this
  • to be over countries but it’s more Emile
  • disease so a powerful man is both equal
  • and overconfident that’s a bad
  • combination and it reminds me of the
  • fact that self perception often ends
  • badly it gives you some benefits at the
  • beginning you fool others you float
  • along but it ends badly think rules and
  • gooders
  • now how soon does this start we know
  • that it starts we know that it starts
  • very early in life deception by six
  • months of age children are already
  • crying out of context now this guy’s
  • about a year old but sorry but he’s
  • really got exact down on the well so
  • let’s watch him a bit
  • suffering agony now is audience
  • disappearance
  • now trust me that boy would keep that up
  • all afternoon but this is a TEDx talk
  • time is limited right now here’s a
  • little boy I loved was about a year of
  • agent and this shows you how the child
  • can quickly learn to use a facial
  • expression in a novel concept
  • you’ll hear the father in the background
  • saying give me the live son you need
  • we’ll look
  • now notice you saw the fake one first in
  • the real one second now we’ll just run
  • through the real the second time it’s
  • the same thing but the father
  • you look good boy but an actual fact in
  • the second key and earlier still the
  • child is Michael’s brother to last three
  • month of pregnancy the child takes over
  • control some others lemon sugar level
  • raises raises mother’s blood pressure
  • redistributes the blood around it takes
  • it away from feet and hands it does this
  • by producing hormones that are either
  • identical to or close chemical mimics of
  • the hormones the mother uses to control
  • those variables at all other times but
  • here’s a test it produces in hormones at
  • a thousand times the concentration that
  • the mother does we believe this is
  • because of a co-evolutionary struggle
  • where initially it started pouring in
  • some extra hormones and then the mother
  • became inert to them and the offspring
  • had to add some and the mother again
  • became deaf because it’s not to her
  • advantage to give the offspring as much
  • as the offspring once he has other
  • children’s just a parcel her resources
  • to fashion presence past present future
  • I should say so we believe that is
  • escalated it so it affect the child said
  • mama behold me good the whole day you
  • see you Harvey but it’s hormones and
  • hormone receptors that are carrying the
  • argument okay now here’s an extremely
  • important finding and its general does
  • it up justify the children the smarter
  • your child is the
  • they live I will give you the experiment
  • in a second but if your child is a
  • little breaks out this is four years old
  • it’s almost time minutes with a little
  • test they lie a hundred percent of the
  • time if you have a sole child 65 percent
  • of the time now what’s the experiment
  • it’s out sitting here there’s a box
  • behind the child someone put something
  • in the box closes it says I leave the
  • room for a couple minutes do not peek do
  • that piece well they watch most children
  • pee then they come in and they say did
  • you beat and both children like about
  • 80% of but the key is that they lie more
  • the smarter they are all right similar
  • effect in monkeys
  • okay this is this is size of the
  • neocortex this social part of the brain
  • but your particular brain size itself if
  • you wanted and what you see is the
  • bigger the neocortex the more often they
  • act receptively in nature this is very
  • carefully controlled data I won’t bother
  • you with those details but the take-home
  • message is this intelligent people are
  • more likely to lie and they’re more
  • likely by logic to practice
  • self-deception
  • we might easily imagine and wish it were
  • otherwise but I don’t believe it is
  • and it means a bright person may have
  • seems to give because of his or her
  • brightness but is their self-deception
  • warping it around in the wrong direction
  • and sore okay I always believe in ending
  • with a little bit of self-criticism and
  • after all if I have a theory of
  • self-deception that applies to your
  • self-deception and yours but doesn’t
  • apply to mine there’s some deficiency
  • here there’s some bias here so I like to
  • end the sub pieces now in the US I
  • almost always end with self-deception a
  • war because we us are always at war and
  • self-deception mates and I knew
  • strong contribution especially to
  • disastrous war now what am I going to
  • talk about in Jamaica
  • there are society level phenomenon of
  • corruption and is that the 48 thing but
  • I don’t know what’s about it I want to
  • talk about something down at my level so
  • here’s the paradox of the contradiction
  • we have an island that is Shaka brah
  • fool
  • I tell you talk about fool with
  • beautiful women period at the same time
  • we have a whole heap of paper
  • heterosexual men who go berserk at the
  • thought that two men are giving each
  • other sexual pleasure what the Rasta
  • George is going on here well let’s add a
  • little bit of science they manage some
  • of using experiments in Georgia where
  • they took a one heterosexual men what’s
  • an a1 heterosexual man that’s someone
  • who has never had a homosexual
  • experience nor a homosexual thought or
  • fantasy or soul each set now you give
  • them a homophobia scale how and here
  • upset or rotted do they get full verb
  • male homosexuality and you divide them
  • into those that are relaxed and do
  • litter Piper upset and now is the fun
  • party to show dirty movies but your
  • first tire participa graph to the base
  • of each man’s wood and the precision of
  • the the petitioner graph allows precise
  • measures of changes in diameter okay so
  • we started off watching six minutes of a
  • man and a woman making love okay
  • pornographic film the wood grows
  • admirably
  • the entire video there’s no difference
  • between the two groups so I won’t tell
  • you which is we now you’ll watch two
  • women making love and the wood starts
  • admirably but then it starts sloping off
  • and it doesn’t quite reach up to a man
  • and a woman again these are
  • statistically indistinguishable now
  • you’re probably guessing what’s down
  • here this is two men getting it on these
  • are non homophobic men men that are not
  • upset and they show a slight and in
  • significant increase in Woodside here
  • are the homophobic men would larger and
  • pick it up here give me the skin
  • somewhere around here you know now we
  • know this in the u.s. this is a monthly
  • occurrence you know that those who are
  • most hostile towards homosexual get
  • outed it’d been looked a preacher or a
  • politician for their secret homosexual
  • life now we don’t know if the laws of
  • psychology that apply in Georgia also
  • apply in Jamaica but it’s a first
  • approximation we have to assume so
  • so that says there they repressed
  • suppressed and repressed homosexuality
  • problem on this island and it comes out
  • in violence now where it comes from you
  • have to ask someone else I’ve spoken to
  • people like Brian chanes see I was born
  • people that have a lot of insight into
  • Jamaican society and they talk about
  • father absent families and the behavior
  • of the mother when she doesn’t have a
  • father and lay down the law and so on
  • I have nothing to say about it I just
  • posed it as a fascist problem of denial
  • projection and debt attack so the cecum
  • self perception is something that
  • applies to all of us at every phase of
  • our life from our most intimate
  • relations who are natural
  • here even to how we talk to ourselves
  • it’s something we can all participate in
  • because the logic is simple and the
  • behaviors universal I think